<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertlets&#8217; Explanation To Why They Were &#8220;Lazy&#8221; And &#8220;Amateurish&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/</link>
	<description>Technology, Reviews, Tutorials, Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adverlets is scam</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-38148</link>
		<dc:creator>adverlets is scam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-38148</guid>
		<description>halo..im so pissed off with advertlets..damn.they never paid me since april 2008! the status said SENT,but i havent receive any.then i checked out couple of months later,still UNPAID.FYI now i have more than RM1000 in my account.but,ive just removed advertlets ads on my site after months of waiting (6 months).the real problem is they keep on beating around the bush.support system sucks too.no matter how much you contact them.lastly they just ignored you! damn.

i know,they gave lame excuse of click fraud.you know what? ive received thousand bucks from Google Adsense without having single problem related to click fraud.we all know Google has a very reputable plus advanced technologies to detect click fraud.

im willing to DESIGN graphics related to this matter,FREELY! email me at advertletscam@gmail.com for details.


let ALL MALAYSIAN BLOGGERS know advertlets is SUCK!! and lets show what we bloggers can do!!

adverlets suck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>halo..im so pissed off with advertlets..damn.they never paid me since april 2008! the status said SENT,but i havent receive any.then i checked out couple of months later,still UNPAID.FYI now i have more than RM1000 in my account.but,ive just removed advertlets ads on my site after months of waiting (6 months).the real problem is they keep on beating around the bush.support system sucks too.no matter how much you contact them.lastly they just ignored you! damn.</p>
<p>i know,they gave lame excuse of click fraud.you know what? ive received thousand bucks from Google Adsense without having single problem related to click fraud.we all know Google has a very reputable plus advanced technologies to detect click fraud.</p>
<p>im willing to DESIGN graphics related to this matter,FREELY! email me at <a href="mailto:advertletscam@gmail.com">advertletscam@gmail.com</a> for details.</p>
<p>let ALL MALAYSIAN BLOGGERS know advertlets is SUCK!! and lets show what we bloggers can do!!</p>
<p>adverlets suck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124; ShaunChng.com - Blog &#124; &#187; Negative side of Advertlets - the bad and the horrible</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-11425</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; ShaunChng.com - Blog &#124; &#187; Negative side of Advertlets - the bad and the horrible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-11425</guid>
		<description>[...] won&#8217;t be digging up old past issues of vulnerability, bugs or claimed hijacks they previously had on their site or during their downtime, neither on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] won&#8217;t be digging up old past issues of vulnerability, bugs or claimed hijacks they previously had on their site or during their downtime, neither on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TenthOfMarch</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>TenthOfMarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ABC &amp; Freethinker&lt;/strong&gt;
Eh-eh, the two of you don&#039;t make me shiver ah. If you want to talk things like that, please send &quot;private messages&quot;. :-P .

&lt;strong&gt;@hongkiat&lt;/strong&gt;
Thanks for dropping by and leaving your comment. Just to clear things up, I am neither here to condemn/attack anybody, nor am I here to help anybody. I am here to blog, and continue to blog I will.

If you have been following my posts and comments, you will know the seriousness of the flaws that were found in Advertlets&#039; system. I think you are a tech guy yourself (are you?), therefore you should understand the degree of vulnerability it causes.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-310&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment made by ABC&lt;/a&gt;, especially this phrase, &quot;&lt;strong&gt;ADMITTING mistakes and MOVE FORWARD&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; is very true. They might not want to admit openly that they screwed up, but the least they could have done would be to just shut up, fix the loopholes, and move on. Instead, they gave &lt;strike&gt;excuses&lt;/strike&gt; explanations that make no sense. Being a tech guy, do you buy into their explanations?

Lastly, I believe their &quot;tactics&quot; of doing business is a pain in &quot;everywhere&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ABC &#038; Freethinker</strong><br />
Eh-eh, the two of you don&#8217;t make me shiver ah. If you want to talk things like that, please send &#8220;private messages&#8221;. <img src='http://www.tenthofmarch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p><strong>@hongkiat</strong><br />
Thanks for dropping by and leaving your comment. Just to clear things up, I am neither here to condemn/attack anybody, nor am I here to help anybody. I am here to blog, and continue to blog I will.</p>
<p>If you have been following my posts and comments, you will know the seriousness of the flaws that were found in Advertlets&#8217; system. I think you are a tech guy yourself (are you?), therefore you should understand the degree of vulnerability it causes.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-310" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">comment made by ABC</a>, especially this phrase, &#8220;<strong>ADMITTING mistakes and MOVE FORWARD</strong>&#8221; is very true. They might not want to admit openly that they screwed up, but the least they could have done would be to just shut up, fix the loopholes, and move on. Instead, they gave <strike>excuses</strike> explanations that make no sense. Being a tech guy, do you buy into their explanations?</p>
<p>Lastly, I believe their &#8220;tactics&#8221; of doing business is a pain in &#8220;everywhere&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>haha.. i can be whatever you want me to be :X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha.. i can be whatever you want me to be :X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hongkiat</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>hongkiat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I guess we should stop here. Maybe we should help them instead of attacking? What you think TenthofMarch? Advertlets of Nuffnang, it doesn&#039;t matter now. They are new but at least they are Asia&#039;s first two. It&#039;s a win win situation I see here, if they can improve from blogger&#039;s suggestions and findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we should stop here. Maybe we should help them instead of attacking? What you think TenthofMarch? Advertlets of Nuffnang, it doesn&#8217;t matter now. They are new but at least they are Asia&#8217;s first two. It&#8217;s a win win situation I see here, if they can improve from blogger&#8217;s suggestions and findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freethinker</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Freethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>ABC, u guy or girl first..hahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC, u guy or girl first..hahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>ten chu freethinker. I love you long long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ten chu freethinker. I love you long long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TenthOfMarch</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>TenthOfMarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@mooiness&lt;/strong&gt;
I didn&#039;t report earlier because I wanted to &quot;wait for bigger fish&quot;. If I just say &quot;IP is the same&quot; again, then &#039;boring&#039; right? I was looking for 3 factors. now 2 out of 3 is confirmed. I&#039;m still waiting for the 3rd one. But the 3rd factor is not so &#039;strong&#039; because it&#039;s more common. So the 2 should be enough already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@mooiness</strong><br />
I didn&#8217;t report earlier because I wanted to &#8220;wait for bigger fish&#8221;. If I just say &#8220;IP is the same&#8221; again, then &#8216;boring&#8217; right? I was looking for 3 factors. now 2 out of 3 is confirmed. I&#8217;m still waiting for the 3rd one. But the 3rd factor is not so &#8217;strong&#8217; because it&#8217;s more common. So the 2 should be enough already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooiness</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>mooiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-345</guid>
		<description>More spoofing?!!? Oh man. Will the hilarity never end? :D

&quot;Amateur&quot; - at least they&#039;d chosen a most appropriate alias this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More spoofing?!!? Oh man. Will the hilarity never end? <img src='http://www.tenthofmarch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;Amateur&#8221; &#8211; at least they&#8217;d chosen a most appropriate alias this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TenthOfMarch</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>TenthOfMarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthofmarch.com/2007/04/19/advertlets-explanation-to-why-they-were-lazy-and-amateurish/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Unknown&lt;/strong&gt;
FYI, I wanted to be a publisher of Advertlets. However, since my unique visitors a day doesn&#039;t surpass their minimum requirement of 100, I had to create a &#039;test account&#039; to enter into their system to review them.

And I believe every single person who commented has the rights to comment and argue on all the points raised. Even though some of them are not publishers of Advertlets, they are *potential* publishers.

As for some of the commenter who are tech savvy (or in the IT industry), I believe they have the rights to comment because the errors and faults done by Advertlets reflects a bad image to the IT industry in a whole. I believe the IT industry is a professional industry which has its own sets of standards that each IT person has to follow.

You must remember. Advertlets are dealing with HUNDREDS (in the future THOUSANDS) of individual&#039;s sensitive personal informations such as telephone numbers, passwords, addresses and more.

&lt;strong&gt;@Josh Lim&lt;/strong&gt;
&quot;Amateur&quot; posted 3 comments and logged 2 different &quot;sets&quot; of IP addresses. Guess what? Both of his IP addresses link to you. Of course, &quot;ip spoofing&quot; bla bla bla. Guess what else I found out? Both of you even use the same feedreader to access my blog, the same version even.

If those comments made by &quot;Amateur&quot; are really from you guys, I think &quot;irresponsible&quot; will be the next word to use.

I don&#039;t want to bring this up, but you seem to be lingering with confidence too much. In your blog, you said, &lt;strong&gt;&quot;From our logs, we could see as various methods were tried&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;. A real hacker will NEVER leave his trace in any logs. They would have been smart enough to bypass the log files. Therefore, what you are seeing in the log files, are just amateur attempts to &#039;test&#039; out your system for BASIC loopholes.

So, if you&#039;re just boasting with confidence based on the log file details, I think you should stop.

Most of the issues raised here should have been addressed &lt;strong&gt;before launching your system&lt;/strong&gt;. Not after getting hundreds of people registered.

&lt;strong&gt;@aw&lt;/strong&gt;
I was getting worried if I should censor it myself. Since you insist, it&#039;s my honor:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Unknown</strong><br />
FYI, I wanted to be a publisher of Advertlets. However, since my unique visitors a day doesn&#8217;t surpass their minimum requirement of 100, I had to create a &#8216;test account&#8217; to enter into their system to review them.</p>
<p>And I believe every single person who commented has the rights to comment and argue on all the points raised. Even though some of them are not publishers of Advertlets, they are *potential* publishers.</p>
<p>As for some of the commenter who are tech savvy (or in the IT industry), I believe they have the rights to comment because the errors and faults done by Advertlets reflects a bad image to the IT industry in a whole. I believe the IT industry is a professional industry which has its own sets of standards that each IT person has to follow.</p>
<p>You must remember. Advertlets are dealing with HUNDREDS (in the future THOUSANDS) of individual&#8217;s sensitive personal informations such as telephone numbers, passwords, addresses and more.</p>
<p><strong>@Josh Lim</strong><br />
&#8220;Amateur&#8221; posted 3 comments and logged 2 different &#8220;sets&#8221; of IP addresses. Guess what? Both of his IP addresses link to you. Of course, &#8220;ip spoofing&#8221; bla bla bla. Guess what else I found out? Both of you even use the same feedreader to access my blog, the same version even.</p>
<p>If those comments made by &#8220;Amateur&#8221; are really from you guys, I think &#8220;irresponsible&#8221; will be the next word to use.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to bring this up, but you seem to be lingering with confidence too much. In your blog, you said, <strong>&#8220;From our logs, we could see as various methods were tried&#8221;</strong>. A real hacker will NEVER leave his trace in any logs. They would have been smart enough to bypass the log files. Therefore, what you are seeing in the log files, are just amateur attempts to &#8216;test&#8217; out your system for BASIC loopholes.</p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re just boasting with confidence based on the log file details, I think you should stop.</p>
<p>Most of the issues raised here should have been addressed <strong>before launching your system</strong>. Not after getting hundreds of people registered.</p>
<p><strong>@aw</strong><br />
I was getting worried if I should censor it myself. Since you insist, it&#8217;s my honor:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
