I will continue blogging. Just make sure you guys continue reading!

1) But I think the most compelling difference between my comment and DevilsAdvocate is that I backed up my opinions by citing examples and “evidence”. I didn’t just say baseless things. I also didn’t use anything “harsher” than “pretentious poofter”, which if read by anyone with a sense of humor, is obviously a “alliterative” jest.

2) I’m no “die hard” supporter of Nuffnang. I don’t even have a blog. But something about Adverlet’s heavy handedness (compared to Nuffnang’s niceness) just gets me.

Cheers, mate. Hope your blog can continue for a long time to come!

@aw
It’s true that it’s a little tough to be fully impartial sometimes, especially when things are becoming a little personal. But I am only human, and will try my best to do what I have to do.

Speaking of specious claims, all I can say are two words: “logo comparison”. It is opinion on your character, substantiated (and reinforced by your current comment, ahahahaha! Oh, the irony) by your actions thus far. It’s up to you to prove otherwise, you can shut people up on the Internet using heavy-handed means. It’s a blog, blogs never claim to be 100% impartial. The essence of a blog is that it *has* a bias of the blogger, that’s why it’s not called a “news site” and is more interesting to read.

Wouldn’t it be ideal for you to censor anonymous users, who are making unwarranted personal attacks and specious claims? Such as the only one in this blog comment thread, who has no URL to his name?

Will you take the same course of action as you did in the past?
Or only if it suits your purposes?

@Mossie`Ol Chin
More like “Welcome to the blogging world”. Haha. Surfing the Internet is just a one way interaction with the screen. Now, I need to adapt to interactions that come from all directions — up, down, left, right, inside-out…

Part 2 SHOULD be coming out…as long as I concentrate on it, and leave everything else aside.

@HORNY ANG MOH
WoW! First, I have ShaolinTiger-AngMoh. Now I have HORNY-Angmoh. LOL!

Seriously H-A-M (eh, you see even your abbreviation is ‘horny’ — haha!), I briefly visited your blog again just now (I read your blog before too), and did read some pretty hor-ny posts. LOL. I actually have two questions to ask:

1. Are you really an Ang Moh?
2. Are you really so horny? Or it’s just a ‘catchy phrase’?

@aw
Sorry for approving your comment late.

I share a lot of the same views as you do. However, I’ll just leave it at that. I do not want to continue in another ‘never-ending-brawl’.

But there is one thing that I do not agree with you. Teh-tarik is bad for health. If you don’t mind, I prefer Milo kosong KAW ais/panas.

@Jason
Thanks for the encouragement.

@Josh Lim
Like I said, there are laws in this world that I have to obey. I’ve read your e-mail and will respond to it after I finished writing my next post.

Errrmm…peace and money will do. No thanks with the love — I’m not ‘that’/your type.

The first thing that turned me off was their “point-by-point” comparison with Nuffnang that is mean-spirited instead of constructive. Comparing *logos*? Come on!

Adverlets also always seem to be on the defensive and has an inferiority complex. Adverlets takes every opportunity to blow their own trumpet – while this is acceptable when describing how they can benefit clients/bloggers, most of the time it takes on a boasting tone. Nuffnang seems more humble and down-to-Earth.

And publicly repeating his offer to “have wine” with the Nuffnang people? “..and if Ming takes up my invitation for wine, maybe we can all be friends” Geezzzzz! Why don’t you have some “cheese” with it as well. It’s so cheesy, it sounds like high-school politics. If you want to have better relations with Nuffnang, just invite them privately.

Why do you have to talk about it in public, to prove that you’re a paragon of magnanimity? To pressure Ming to have wine with you? To show that Ming is being bad if he does not take up your offer to “have wine”?

Thus I agree with TenthofMarch first paragraph that Adverlets “are very manipulative”.

Secondly, Josh so high class one. Have WINE? In KL, we just go mamak or at the most, Starbucks.

Seems like a pretentious poofter. Me, I’ll have the 2007 vintage of Teh Tarik Le Chateau Mamak. I hear 2007 is a good year, well-balanced with the tannins and the acidity kept down to a minimum. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA